Translation is vulnerable because it is a dynamic process
The vulnerability of translation stems from its inherent characteristic. It is a dynamic process. Cultural differences (between the original author, that of the translator and that of the intended readers/listeners and language change are two of the factors that drive the process. Add to this the fact that translation is done by humans, and one has a potentiality for extreme efficiency or total confusion. The complexity of human bias (cultural, religious and personal) renders the process vulnerable. Political agendas may also factor into the process, e.g. a translator trying to increase the importance of his or her dialect/tribe/social group by using a specific dialect/sociolect.
The latter dynamic finds a collateral in the complexity of the persons and organizations that promote, support and execute translation. The predilections of humans generally find expression in various confessional, denominational and academic presuppositions.
The discussion will center on identifying manifestations of the above, and attempting to find ways in which the vulnerability of translation can be limited. Alternatively, how vulnerability may be utilized as a stimulus for advancement of the ultimate goals of translation through innovation and creativity.


1 comment
Sign in to join the conversation.
Yes, let's get this discussion going! I am particularly interested in the disparities between the literate translator (expatriate or mother-tongue) and the potential orally-oriented audience ("...the original author, that of the translator and that of the intended readers/listeners") as well as the translator recognizing that those disparities are there. I like your defining some of the vulnerabilities. I hope that we can find effective way to limit those vulnerabilities. Let's do it!