Frames, again.
RBRobert Bascom · Sep 17, 2015, 12:48 AM · Last modified: Sep 28, 2026, 11:37 AM
♡ 0
But maybe frames can be rehabilitated. I always thought they should be seen as dynamic ("framing," a la Erving Goffman) rather than portrayed in the static way they usually were/are. But recently I found what I think is an even better (or at least complementary) way to think about frames and framing that comes from the following TED Radio Hour podcast (which is interesting in itself in a number of other ways as well):
A frame can be seen as something that you can look through (like a window) or go through (like a door) to get into and experience another, alternate world on the other side.
Now we're talking!


2 comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
I still say frames, but I mean framing.
Frames have never been a problem for me, since in my mother tongue (Finnish) the metaphore was and is used all the time. But, dynamism, of course, because the frames are as dynamic as other parts of human life and experience.