MAP — Modular Aggregation of Principles for Bible Translation

As unlikely as this may seem, it does have some support in what are known as phonaesthemes within languages. For example, in English: gl- seems to be related to emanation of light, as in "glow, glimmer, glisten," etc., and sn- seems to be related to nose/air, as in "snort, sniff, sneeze," etc.

Here is the post on phonaesthemes:

Extracted text from http://www.latimes.com:

Live coverage: Rams vs. Seahawks at the Coliseum

Science Now Discoveries from the world of science and medicine Science Science Now In world's languages, scientists discover shared links between sound and meaning

Jamaican sprinter Usain Bolt, right, shakes hands with Japanese runners on Aug. 19 at the Olympic Games in Rio de Janeiro. A new study finds surprising shared sound patterns across unrelated languages around the world. (Eric Feferberg / AFP/Getty Images) Amina Khan Sifting through two-thirds of the worlds languages, scientists have discovered a strange pattern: Words with the same meanings in different languages often seem to share the same sounds even when those two languages are completely unrelated.

The findings, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, run counter to a long-held idea in linguistics and could complicate the work of researchers trying to trace the history and evolution of the worlds languages.

If you look at basic words across unrelated languages from disparate parts of the world, youll typically find they sound nothing alike, the study authors point out. For example, ptitsa, ndege and tori all mean bird in Russian, Swahili and Japanese, respectively.

See the most-read stories in Science this hour

The idea that there is essentially no relation between sound and meaning has [existed for] over 100 years now, said lead author Damian Blasi, a language data scientist at the University of Zurich in Switzerland and the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History in Germany. And it strikes at something really intuitive.

Researchers often discount the idea that sounds might have some relationship to the meaning of their words in part because it encourages half-baked thinking that could lead to flawed science, Blasi said.

I think the reason why some of these ideas have a bad reputation is because people have proposed a lot of very sloppy theories, Blasi said.

Certainly, you might find related words within a language that sound alike think glance, glimmer and glare in English, which all have to do with vision and begin with a gl. But that doesnt mean youd find the same gl-cluster across other languages as well.

Still, Blasi and his colleagues realized there wasnt a whole lot of data backing up this claim either way. But advancements in computing and modern statistical methods now mean that, instead of comparing a few or a few dozen languages, the scientists could do what generations of linguists before them could not: analyze thousands of language data sets at once.

The team studied nearly two-thirds of the worlds 6,000-plus languages using word lists covering about 100 shared basic concepts, checking to see if similar sounds kept cropping up. (For example, snow, while its a basic concept, is not shared, since many languages arose in places that never have any; but rocks are a ubiquitous feature of natural human habitats.)

Move over DNA. Scientists canidentify you based on the unique pattern of proteins in your hair Of course, plenty of languages share words that have similar sounds because theyre either descendedfrom the same original language (such as Spanish hospital and French hopital, both of which arose from Latin) or because theyve borrowed heavily (as English did after the French invaded in the Norman Conquest of 1066). The researchers had to make sure to rule out sound patterns that were similar simply because two languages were related.

The problem is, some researchers disagree about which languages are related, and how. So the scientists based their analyses on two different linguistic family trees, looking for patterns that were clear enough to survive under both models.

The researchers found, to their surprise, a number of sound/meaning relationships that cropped up across unrelated languages.

For example, words for tongue often tend to have an l or a u (such as the Spanish lengua).Words for nose often have an n sound. Words for round often have an r, and small is associated with ee sounds. These preferences werent universal far from it but they appeared over and over again.

Researchers are already fielding possible explanations for why these patterns crop up: perhaps l is associated with tongues and n is associated with noses because those body parts play a role in making those sounds, Blasi said. It might be that other associations are due to synesthesia an ability to link perceptions from one sense to another (for example, seeing colors when hearing music).

But the scientists avoided trying to pin down explanations for the phenomena they observed.

We dont take any stance with respect to the origin, Blasi said. We just say, What is the data saying? Is there any strong association, yes or no? Well, it seems that there is. Why? Thats a different question.

The more we look into languages, the more we learn that they are extremely complex, and that we have to take them seriously. Damian Blasi, language data scientist at the University of Zurich Its far too easy to come up with unfounded theories to explain such patterns, Blasi said. He even tested this problem out at a conference a few years ago by making up links between words and sounds fire and the sound of t, for example and would randomly ask people to explain these associations. People found a reasonable explanation every time for a relationship that did not actually exist.

Instead, scientists may have to probe these preferences experimentally, Blasi said. Perhaps you could make up words for two different alienlanguages, and test people to see if they found it easier to remember words with the preferences found in this paper.

The findings may have implications for linguists who look for shared sounds (and predictable changes) in current and older written languages to try toreconstruct their ancient, long-gone ancestors. Blasis study shows that some of those shared characteristics between sisterlanguages may not be inherited from a motherlanguage; instead, they could have arisen independently, simply because humans tend to like certain sounds with certain words.

That calls into question some of the attempts that people have put forward in order to determine the prehistory of many linguistic families, Blasi said.

This could throw a curveball into the work of researchers tracing our linguistic heritage.

The more we look into languages, the more we learn that they are extremely complex, and that we have to take them seriously, he said.

CAPTION New Planet Proxima b CAPTION How scientists use satellite data to track poverty in Africa amina.khan@latimes.com

Follow@aminawriteon Twitter for more science newsand "like"Los Angeles Times Science & HealthonFacebook.

MORE IN SCIENCE

What are the long-term health effects of living in space? NASA is studying twins Mark and Scott Kelly to find out

Ethnic groups' government influence and Internet access go hand in hand, study says

Parasitologist bestows squirmy honor on his distant cousin, President Obama

Copyright 2016, Los Angeles Times Scientific Research Single mom dresses as a man to attend Donuts with Dad at sons schoolOddChatter Drones to deliver burritos on college campusOddChatter Burger King unveils Cheetos Chicken FriesOddChatter

MOST POPULAREMMYSLOCALSPORTSPOLITICSORANGE COUNTYOPINIONPLACE AN AD 84 This is your first free story of the month. Subscribe for unlimited access, only 99 for 4 weeks.

Extracted text from https://map.bloomfire.com:

TypeError: undefined is not a function (evaluating 'o.canPlayType('video/mp4; codecs="avc1.42E01E"')')

Benjamin Bergen on Phonaesthemes About the Contributor Part of Series: Negotiating Meaning-part 2: Language and Society Categories: Languages and Linguistics Tags: language ecology

2 comments

JSJeff ShrumSep 19, 2016, 1:21 PM

In the study of the phonology of a language it is common to look at onomatopoetic words to confirm how sounds pattern in a language. In the cross-linguistic comparisons I have seen the onomatopoeia in languages are very different.

♡ 0

PSPhilip StineSep 19, 2016, 7:42 PM

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose. 1964, Introduction to Linguistics 411 with Dr. Herbert Paper at the University of Michigan, we had a jolly time going through exactly these kinds of things in different languages. Paper would throw out a word in some language we didn't know and ask what it might refer to. We could say whether it described large or small, male or female, visual or audio, solid or liquid, etc. - exactly what this article says has been pooh-poohed by linguists until now! Sounds such as /gl-/, /sl-/ really do have some kind of meaning, we found. I'm delighted that Damian Blasi has confirmed this, but why does he think it's new?

Does sense affect the sounds of words?

2 comments