N. T. Wright on David Bentley Hart's translation of the New Testament
The New Testament in the strange words of David Bentley Hart, by N. T. Wright
It turns out Wright is not a huge fan of Hart's work. This is his conclusion:
"I was reminded more than once of a particular medieval edition of the Old Testament which, displaying Hebrew, Latin, and Greek in parallel columns, was likened by one monk to Christ between two thieves—the traitorous Jew and the heretic Greek. Hart switches this image around: Greek theology is central and the Western tradition is the enemy, from the Augustine he dislikes to the comfortable modern Protestants he dislikes even more. As for the Jewish setting of early Christianity—a key part of Christianity’s early “strangeness”—Hart discounts it altogether. Paul’s scriptural tales may look like Israel’s history but are simply homespun allegories. The new covenant is “not of scripture but of spirit; for scripture slays but spirit makes alive.” And “we slave in newness of spirit and not in scripture’s obsolescence” (Rom. 7:6). Hart’s conviction that “scripture” is a literal translation of the Greek gramma, like much of his translation, is as idiosyncratic as it is bold."


2 comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
In one place Wright complains, "Granted, the word pneuma was multivalent for Paul and in his context, but the combination of these two puzzles (capitalization and article) produces neither clarity nor beauty." But clarity and beauty are values Wright wants to promote. Hart is aiming for some foreignization and defamilarization, and some of the kinds of things Wright points to will produce that. I don't think either of their translations is what I'd regularly use from the pulpit, but they can be worth consulting to see if they might make us pay more attention to some details we might overlook in our complacency with our familiar translations.
David Bentley Hart's response to Wright's review may be found here: https://afkimel.wordpress.com/2018/01/16/a-reply-to-n-t-wright/