And Then Job Said Unto the Lord: You Can’t Be Serious
Extracted text from https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/09/job-edward-l-greenstein/594769/:
The Atlantic Popular Latest Sections SECTIONS Politics Culture Technology Ideas Science Books Family Global Health Education Business Letters The Masthead Our Towns Photo Podcasts The Atlantic Crossword Video Events Writers Projects Magazine MAGAZINE Current issue All issues Manage subscription Give a Gift Subscribe Subscribe
Search SEARCH QUICK LINKS Dear Therapist Crossword Puzzle Manage Subscription BOOKS And Then Job Said Unto the Lord: You Cant Be Serious In a new translation of the Book of Job, the famously repentant hero gives God a piece of his mind. JAMES PARKER SEPTEMBER 2019 ISSUE Job: A New Translation BY EDWARD L. GREENSTEIN YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS
OLIVER MUNDAY; MUSEO NACIONAL DE ARTE So god says to Satan, You there, what have you been up to? And Satan says, Oh, you know, just hanging around, minding my own business. And God says, Well, take a look at my man Job over there. He worships me. He does exactly what I tell him. He thinks Im the greatest. Job? says Satan. The rich, happy, healthy guy? The guy with 3,000 camels? Of course he does. Youve given him everything. Take it all away from him, and I bet you hell curse you to your face. And God says, Youre on.
Thatgive or take a couple of versesis how it starts, the Book of Job. What a setup. The Trumplike deity; the shrewd and loitering adversary; the cruelly flippant wager; and the stooge, the cosmic straight man, Job, upon whose oblivious head the sky is about to fall. A classic Old Testament skit, pungent as a piece of absurdist theater or a story by Kafka. Job is going to be immiserated, sealed into sorrowfor a bet. What is life? Its a bleeping and blooping Manichaean casino: Youre up or youre down, in Gods hands or the devils. Piped-in oxygen, controlled light, keep the drinks coming. We, the readers and inheritors of his book, know this. Job, poor bastard, doesnt. After his herds have been finished off by marauders and gushes of heavenly fire, and his children have been flattened by falling masonry, and he himself has been covered in running sores from head to toeafter all this happens to the blameless man, he cracks. He sits on an ash heap, seeping and scratching, and reviles the day he was born. Let that day be darkness, as the King James Version has it. Let not God regard it from above, neither let the light shine upon it. Let darkness and the shadow of death stain it; let a cloud dwell upon it; let the blackness of the day terrify it.
Howls of despair are a biblical staple, but Jobs self-cursethe special physics of it, the suicidal pulse that he sends backwards, like a black rainbow, toward the hour of his own conceptionis singular. Dispossessed of everything, he is choosing nothing. That first prickle of my existence, the point of light with my name on it? Turn around, All-Fathering One, and eclipse it. Delete.
YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS Edward L. Greensteins new translation of the Book of Job is a work of erudition withas we shall seea revolutionary twist. A professor emeritus of Bible studies at Israels Bar-Ilan University, Greenstein is not going for the deep-time sonorities of the Authorized Version. His language is lumpy with scholarly fidelity to the text. But the shock of repudiation is undiminished. Why couldnt I die after leaving the wombJust go out the loins and stop breathing? his Job demands. For what did knees have to receive me? For what were the breasts that I sucked? And later: Why have you made me your target? This is where we moderns, we dopes marooned in the universe, love Job and find brotherhood with him. Because hes been in us since the beginning, since the first germ of our separateness from everything elsea man confronting the mystery, as if there was a strand of our DNA in the shape of a question mark: Why?
Now some friends of Job appear and offer, one after another, the conventional pieties: God is great, Job must have done something wrong, how dare he question the ways of the Lord, etc. Theyre hard to take, these friendsBildad, Eliphaz, and Zophar, droning away. Job rejects their arguments, and its here, as the debate goes windily back and forth, that a 21st-century reader reaches for his phone. The stark, existential lines of the drama have gotten spoiled; the Kafka-voltage has dropped.
But then: enter God. Up speaks YHWH, as Greenstein puts it, momentarily folksya voice from the windstorm. Bind up your loins like a man, God warns Job, before stamping on the effects pedal and delivering perhaps the most shattering speech ever recorded. Question after question, power chord after power chord: Where were you when I laid earths foundations? Can you tie the bands of the Pleiades, Or loosen the cords of Orion? Do you give the horse its bravery? No explanation; no answer for Job; no moral or theoretical content whatsoever. Its the interrogation of consciousness by pure Being, by the Logos, by the unstopping, unmediated act of creation itself. Do not try this at home. Does the falcon take flight through your wisdom, As it spreads its wings toward the south? The human intellect shrinks before the onslaught. The language is incomparable. God, it turns out, is the greatest poet; no one can touch him. Read: A mind-bending translation of the New Testament
And its at this point, with Job reduced to a pair of smoking sandals and the divine mega-monologue still ringing in the vaults of the firmament, that Greenstein and centuries of tradition diverge. He has produced his new translation of Job, he tells us in the introduction, to set the record straight. Every version of the Bible that you have read puts Job, in the wake of Gods speech, in an attitude of awestruck contrition or reconversion. Wherefore I abhor myself, and repent in dust and ashes, he says in the King James. Im sorryforgive me, he says in Eugene H. Petersons million-selling plain-language adaptation, The Message. Ill never do that again, I promise! Greensteins Job, however, stays vinegary to the end. I have heard you, he tells God, and now my eye has seen you. That is why I am fed up. The Hebrew phrase commonly rendered as some form of I repent, Greenstein translates as I take pity on. Dust and ashes, meanwhile, is for Greenstein a biblical epithet meaning humanity in general. So the line becomes I take pity on dust and ashes. Jobs last word: What a world youve made, God. I feel sorry for everyone.
What does it mean? This newly revealed Job, writes Greenstein, is expressing defiance, not capitulation If God is all about power and not morality and justice, Job will not condone it through acceptance. Upon the scholarly merits of this approach, I am unable to pronounce; as an idea, Ill consider it. We dont read the Bible, its been said; the Bible reads us. It searches us. And here for us in 2019, right on time, with tyranny back in style and riding its behemoth through the streets, is a middle-finger Job, a Job unreconciled to the despotism of experience. Hes been shattered by life-shocks; then God, like a wall of terrible noise, fills and overfills his mind. His response: Thank you, but no.
Gloria Dei est vivens homo, wrote Saint Irenaeus: The glory of God is a living man. Might not the Author of Life look with favor upon this brilliantly resistant creature, this unappeasable critical thinker, this supremely lonely and dissenting figure, this Bartleby with boilsunswayed by the sublime, scratching his scabs in the land of Uz? That might be the rankest heresy: Let me know, bishops. But consider what Greensteins nonpenitent, polarity-reversed Job has done to the ending of the book. As before, with the experiment over, Job is blandly restored to a state of health and wealth; as before, God upbraids the sententious friends, the Bildads and the Eliphazes and the Zophars, and sends them off to make some burnt offerings, for you did not speak about me in honesty as did my servant Job. The quality or valence of this honesty, however, has turned upside down. It has become a kind of white-knuckle existential tenacity, a refusal to disown oneself even in the teeth of the windstorm. Maybe thats what this God, faced with this Job, is telling us: Bring it all before him, the full grievance of your humanity. Bring him your condition, loudly. Let him have it.
This article appears in the September 2019 print edition with the headline Sorry, Not Sorry.
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com. James Parker is a staff writer at The Atlantic and the author of Turned On. About Our History Staff Careers Shop Contact Help Center Contact Us Send a News Tip Advertise Press Podcasts Radio Atlantic Crazy/Genius The Atlantic Interview Audio Articles Subscription Purchase Give a Gift Manage Subscription Download iOS App Newsletters Follow PrivacyPolicy AdvertisingGuidelines TermsConditions ResponsibleDisclosure U.S.Edition WorldEdition SiteMap TheAtlantic.com Copyright (c) 2019 by The Atlantic Monthly Group. All Rights Reserved.
The Atlantic
BESbswyBESbswyBESbswy BESbswyBESbswyBESbswy BESbswyBESbswyBESbswy BESbswyBESbswyBESbswy


2 comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
Not having thought through the Hebrew of Job's response, it has always struck me that Job's response to God's presence is so different from his previous response to his suffering. Scripture says that he never sinned in all he said, yet why then is the need for repentance when God shows up (in the traditional exegesis)? I'd love to hear some scholarly response to Greenstein (both from a linguistic point of view and from a literary).
I can't offer much scholarship, but let's assume Job was without sin - defined as walking within the wisdom, knowledge of God which he had. This knowledge is suddenly hugely expanded in the final chapters and he has to rethink everything (the Greek term would be metanoia, commonly translated repentance). In Hebrew terms could one talk of turning from previous limited understanding to embrace new revelation?