Clusivity in the OT
I've posted about the TIPs project before and would like to ask for advice.
One important area in Bible translation is the question of clusivity (whether or not to use inclusive or exclusive 1st person plural pronouns in a translation into a language that requires that). This is an area where there has been quite a bit of documentation (see for instance https://tips.translation.bible/story/inclusive-vs-exclusive-pronoun-1cor-212/).
In going through the text of the New Testament I also had a document that was prepared by SIL some 50 years ago with recommendations on what to use for each occurence (see https://tips.translation.bible/story/inclusive-vs-exclusive-pronoun-phlm-11/ as an example). Clearly there are many exceptions to those rules but it still gave me a good starting point for the project. Im not aware of any such document for the OT or the deuterocanonicals. So (unless you are aware of such a document), here is my question:
How reasonable would it be for me to pick two or three already translated languages that use clusivity with a relatively regular system on how the pronouns are formed and go through the OT and make lists of how they dealt with the question for each occurrence of a 1st person plural pronoun as a starting point? It would be a bit of tedious work but has the potential of being helpful.
And the second question: Do you know languages that would lend themselves to that endeavor?
Any pointers are appreciated.


1 comment
Sign in to join the conversation.
The Vietnam Bible Society's Jarai translation might help. OT is complete and published (and available through Paratext resources). Roman-based script, so easy to evaluate/search. Jarai clearly distinguishes in/ex-clusive 1st Pl pronouns. The translation seems to have been done carefully and tends towards the literal end of the spectrum.