NidaMAP — Modular Aggregation of Principles for Bible Translation
EnglishGeneral

Metonymic Chains in the Bible

JGJean Gotopo · Jun 20, 2024, 4:50 PM · Last modified: Sep 28, 2026, 11:39 AM
♡ 0

Definition of Metonymic Chains

Metonymic strings are relationships between two or more metonyms, or even between a metonymy and another figure of speech, in which one word or phrase is replaced by another with which it has a contiguous relationship or logical association, rather than a relationship of similarity. Unlike metaphor, which is based on resemblance, metonymy is based on a real and direct relationship. A classic example of metonymy is the use of "crown" to refer to "royalty." Metonymic chains, in particular, are sequences of linked metonyms that form a logical and continuous link, enriching the meaning of the texts.

A metaphor is based on a source domain and a goal domain.

  • Source domain: It is the field of concrete or physical experience from which the literal meaning of the word or phrase is taken.
  • Target domain: It is the abstract or conceptual field to which the figurative meaning of the word or phrase is applied.

In a metaphor, we take characteristics from the source domain and apply them to the target domain to understand or express an abstract or complex idea.

Metonymic Chains in the Bible

The Bible, as an ancient text rich in symbolism and figurative language, uses metonymic strings extensively to communicate deep and complex truths in an accessible and memorable way

During a hermeneutics class, a question arose from one of my classmates in which he expressed that he did not know exactly what kind of figure of speech was being raised in 1 Corinthians 11:24. And it was difficult to determine since there is not only one figure. By posing it as a single metaphor, it comes to light that the source domain (the concrete) is the Bread, and the Meta domain (the abstract) is the body of Jesus. But in this case, we have that the body of Jesus is something concrete. There is a second relationship and I proceed to explain it:

Chain Breakdown

  1. First Relationship: Metaphor

    • Source Domain (Bread) → Meta Domain (Body of Jesus)
    • Here, the bread is used metaphorically to represent the body of Jesus. Bread, a physical and essential food, symbolizes the body of Jesus that will be given and sacrificed.
  2. Second Relationship: Metonymy

    • Source Domain (Body of Jesus) → Goal Domain (Suffering of Jesus in the Flesh)
    • In this relationship, Jesus' body is used metonymically to represent his suffering and sacrifice on the cross. Metonymy is given because Jesus' physical body is a significant part that represents all of his suffering and sacrifice.

Full Chain

Bread (Source Domain) → Metaphor → Body of Jesus (Meta Domain, but also new Source Domain) → Metonymy → Suffering and Sacrifice of Jesus (Meta Domain).

Detailed Explanation

Metaphor: Bread → Body of Jesus

Bread, as a concrete element, is used to symbolize the body of Jesus. This metaphor allows participants in the Eucharist or Holy Communion to understand bread not only as physical food, but as a symbol of Jesus' sacrificial body.

Metonymy: Body of Jesus → Suffering of Jesus

The body of Jesus, which is directly mentioned in the ritual of the Lord's Supper, represents all the suffering and sacrifice that Jesus experienced at the crucifixion. The metonymy here is given because the "body" is used to refer to the entire experience of Jesus' sacrifice and physical suffering.

Other Examples of Metonymic Chains in the Bible

Some significant examples of how these chains are used in different biblical contexts are explored below.

1. From the Temple to the Body of Christ

A notable example of a metonymic chain is found in the transition from the concept of the Temple in Jerusalem to the body of Christ. In the Old Testament, the Temple is the place where God dwells among His people (1 Kings 8:10-11). In the New Testament, Jesus refers to his own body as the Temple: "Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up" (John 2:19), speaking of his death and resurrection. Finally, believers are described as the body of Christ (1 Corinthians 12:27), where the Holy Spirit dwells (1 Corinthians 6:19). Thus, the metonymic chain develops from the physical Temple → Body of Christ → Church as the body of Christ.

2. The Bread and Wine in the Eucharist

Another metonymic chain is found in the use of bread and wine during the Eucharist. In the account of the Last Supper, Jesus takes the bread and says, "This is my body" (Luke 22:19), and the wine, "This is my blood" (Luke 22:20). Here, the bread and wine are metonyms for the body and blood of Christ, respectively. Furthermore, these words connect with the Old Testament paschal sacrifice, where the sacrificial lamb is a metonymy for Israel's deliverance from Egypt (Exodus 12). Therefore, the metonymic chain is formed: Bread and wine → Body and blood of Christ → Paschal Sacrifice → Liberation.

3. From the Shepherd to the Divine King

In the Psalms and other prophetic books, the image of the shepherd is used to describe God. "The Lord is my shepherd; I shall not want" (Psalm 23:1). Jesus appropriates this image in the New Testament, saying, "I am the good shepherd" (John 10:11). This image of the shepherd is linked to the figure of the king, especially in the context of the Davidic monarchy, where the king was seen as the shepherd of his people (2 Samuel 5:2). Thus, the metonymic chain here is: Shepherd → King → God → Jesus as the good shepherd.

4. From the Seed to the Kingdom of God

Jesus frequently uses agricultural parables to describe the Kingdom of God. One of the most well-known is that of the sower: "The kingdom of heaven is like a man who sowed good seed in his field" (Matthew 13:24). Here, the seed is a metonymy for God's Word and its growth represents the growth of the Kingdom of God in people's hearts. In this way, the metonymic chain is: Seed → Word of God → Spiritual Growth → Kingdom of God.

Conclusion

Metonymic strings in the Bible not only enrich the understanding of sacred texts, but also allow readers to grasp deep and meaningful theological connections. From the depiction of the Temple to the metaphor of the shepherd and the Kingdom of God, these figures of speech reveal the continuity and coherence of biblical messages, facilitating a greater appreciation of their literary wisdom and beauty. We know that believers are not just participating in a symbolic act, but actively remembering the suffering and sacrifice of Jesus. The metaphorical/metonymic chain deepens this experience by physically connecting the act of eating with the suffering of Jesus.

2 comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

MAMatt AJun 21, 2024, 3:26 PM

Thank you for this analysis and discussion, Jean. Not only did I find the content helpful, I also found the formatting to be helpful. It helped me to follow your argument well. The argument itself is fascinating and gives a good framework for analyzing texts that are dense with imagery. 

I'm wondering how you might analyze another really dense bit of imagery from Matthew 6:22-23:

The eye is the lamp of the body. So, if your eye is healthy, your whole body will be full of light, but if your eye is bad, your whole body will be full of darkness. If then the light in you is darkness, how great is the darkness! (ESV)

These two verses have a lot going on. There are metaphors, metonymies, and at least one double meaning, as well as a question (to the exegete) of intended view of anatomy/physiology. Here is what I understand:

  • Metaphor: Eye → Lamp (Based on how you answer the following question, the eye either lets light into or lets light out of the body.)
  • (Exegetical) Question: Did this assume an intromissive (light comes in) or extromissive (light goes out) of the eye? (Given parallels in Luke 6:43-45 and 11:33-36, I find the extromissive view more compelling)
  • Metonymy?: Eye →  Body (In addition to acting as a kind of doorway [my own metaphor regarding the act of letting light in or out] the eye seems to stand as a representative of the body)
  • Metaphor: Lamp → Light-Giver, Light-Spreader (Continuing the lines of thought above, the lamp gives light in order to let people see)
  • Metaphor: Light vs Darkness → Righteousness vs Unrighteousness (This is wide open for interpretation, but I see light here as representing the right-living of the kingdom and darkness as the opposite)
  • Metonymy: Body → Life (It seems to me that 'body' is a metonymy [or metaphor?] for the deeds done in the body [ie, the life, or lived actions])
  • Good/Healthy Eye vs Bad Eye -- Double Meaning (This double meaning is exemplified in v24):
    • Metaphor/Idiom?: Good/Healthy Eye vs Bad Eye → Generous vs Stingy (Deut 15:9, 28:54-57; Sirach 14:8-10, 34:12-13; Prov 22:9, 23:6, 28:22; Matt 20:15)
    • Metaphor: Good/Healthy Eye vs Bad Eye → Singular Devotion vs Divided Devotion (2Cor 11:3; Eph 6:5; Col 3:22)

I'm not sure if I missed any other images, but how would you propose talking about the string of metaphors and metonymies in these two verses?

♡ 0
JGJean GotopoJun 22, 2024, 4:27 PM

Thank you for your insightful response, Matt T. I appreciate your detailed analysis and the thoughtful questions you've raised regarding the dense imagery in Matthew 6:22-23. Let's delve into the string of metaphors and metonymies, as well as other rhetorical elements in these verses.

I have written the answer to your question as an article, I have taken your contributions, which is why I have added you as a contributor. I hope it is useful to you. I'll give you the link anyway.

Rethorical Chains in Matthew 6:22-23

♡ 0