The LXX and the canon of the Bible
Extracted text from Table_LXX.pptx:
Table of books in the LXX (Septuagint)
Greek Law
English
Genesis
Exodus Leviticus Numbers Deuteronomy
History N Joshua
Judges Ruth I Samuel II Samuel
I Kings II Kings I Chronicles II Chronicles 1 Esdras
Ezra-Nehemiah Tobit / Tobias Judith Esther with additions 1 Maccabees 2 Maccabees 3 Maccabees
Wisdom Psalms Psalm151 Prayer of Manasseh
o o
Job Proverbs Ecclesiastes Song of Solomon Wisdom Sirach or Ecclesiasticus Psalms of Solomon
Prophets The Twelve Hosea Amos Micah
'
Joel Obadiah Jonah Nahum Habakkuk Zephaniah Haggai
Zachariah Malachi
Isaiah Jeremiah Baruch Lamentations
Letter of Jeremiah Ezekiel Daniel with additions Appendix
'
4 Macabeos
The Deuterocanonical books are: Tobias or Tobit Judith The "Greek additions" to the Book of Esther Wisdom Ecclesiasticus, or Sirach Baruch The Letter of Jeremiah (Baruch 6) The Book of Daniel with Greek additions The Prayer of Azariah (Daniel 3:24-50) The Song of the 3 Young Men (Daniel 3:5190) Susanna (Daniel 13) Bel and the Dragon (Daniel 14) 1 Maccabees
Jerome (hebraica veritas)
Augustine (LXX)
Martin Luther
The British and Foreign Bible Society All King James Bibles published before 1666 included the deuterocanonical books. In 1826, the British and Foreign Bible Society decided that they had no funds to pay for the printing of Bible with the deuterocanonical (apocryphal) books. This decision was then also followed by the publishers of the RVR in 1862. Since then, modern editions, translations and reprints of Bibles produced by evangelical churches have omitted the deuterocanonical books. Many reprints of older versions (eg. KJV) of the Bible now omit the deuterocanonical books
Matt. 2:16 - Herod's decree of slaying innocent children was prophesied in Wis. 11:7 - slaying the holy innocents. Matt. 6:19-20 - Jesus' statement about laying up for yourselves treasure in heaven follows Sirach 29:11 - lay up your treasure. Matt.. 7:12 - Jesus' golden rule "do unto others" is the converse of Tobit 4:15 what you hate, do not do to others. Matt. 7:16,20 - Jesus' statement "you will know them by their fruits" follows Sirach 27:6 - the fruit discloses the cultivation. Matt. 9:36 - the people were "like sheep without a shepherd" is same as Judith 11:19 - sheep without a shepherd. Matt. 11:25 - Jesus' description "Lord of heaven and earth" is the same as Tobit 7:18 - Lord of heaven and earth. Matt. 12:42 - Jesus refers to the wisdom of Solomon which was recorded and made part of the deuterocanonical books. Matt. 16:18 - Jesus' reference to the "power of death" and "gates of Hades" references Wisdom 16:13. Matt. 22:25; Mark 12:20; Luke 20:29 - Gospel writers refer to the canonicity of Tobit 3:8 and 7:11 regarding the seven brothers. Matt. 24:15 - the "desolating sacrilege" Jesus refers to is also taken from 1 Macc. 1:54 and 2 Macc. 8:17. Matt. 24:16 - let those "flee to the mountains" is taken from 1 Macc. 2:28. Matt. 27:43 - if He is God's Son, let God deliver him from His adversaries follows Wisdom 2:18. Mark 4:5,16-17 - Jesus' description of seeds falling on rocky ground and having no root follows Sirach 40:15. Mark 9:48 - description of hell where their worm does not die and the fire is not quenched references Judith 16:17. Exodus 23:7 - do not slay the innocent and righteous - Dan. 13:53 - do not put to death an innocent and righteous person.
Luke 1:42 - Elizabeth's declaration of Mary's blessedness above all women follows Uzziah's declaration in Judith 13:18. Luke 1:52 - Mary's magnificat addressing the mighty falling from their thrones and replaced by lowly follows Sirach 10:14. Luke 2:29 - Simeon's declaration that he is ready to die after seeing the Child Jesus follows Tobit 11:9. Luke 13:29 - the Lord's description of men coming from east and west to rejoice in God follows Baruch 4:37. Luke 21:24 - Jesus' usage of "fall by the edge of the sword" follows Sirach 28:18.
Luke 24:4 and Acts 1:10 - Luke's description of the two men in dazzling apparel reminds us of 2 Macc. 3:26. John 1:3 - all things were made through Him, the Word, follows Wisdom 9:1. John 3:13 - who has ascended into heaven but He who descended from heaven references Baruch 3:29. John 4:48; Acts 5:12; 15:12; 2 Cor. 12:12 - Jesus', Luke's and Paul's usage of "signs and wonders" follows Wisdom 8:8.
John 5:18 - Jesus claiming that God is His Father follows Wisdom 2:16. John 6:35-59 - Jesus' Eucharistic discourse is foreshadowed in Sirach 24:21. John 10:22 - the identification of the feast of the dedication is taken from 1 Macc. 4:59. John 15:6 - branches that don't bear fruit and are cut down follows Wis. 4:5 where branches are broken off. Acts 1:15 - Luke's reference to the 120 may be a reference to 1 Macc. 3:55 - leaders of tens / restoration of the twelve. Acts 10:34; Rom. 2:11; Gal. 2:6 - Peter's and Paul's statement that God shows no partiality references Sirach 35:12. Acts 17:29 - description of false gods as like gold and silver made by men follows Wisdom 13:10. Rom 1:18-25 - Paul's teaching on the knowledge of the Creator and the ignorance and sin of idolatry follows Wis. 13:1-10.
Rom. 4:17 - Abraham is a father of many nations follows Sirach 44:19. Rom. 5:12 - description of death and sin entering into the world is similar to Wisdom 2:24. Rom. 9:21 - usage of the potter and the clay, making two kinds of vessels follows Wisdom 15:7. 1 Cor. 2:16 - Paul's question, "who has known the mind of the Lord?" references Wisdom 9:13. 1 Cor. 6:12-13; 10:23-26 - warning that, while all things are good, beware of gluttony, follows Sirach 36:18 and 37:28-30. 1 Cor. 8:5-6 - Paul acknowledging many "gods" but one Lord follows Wis. 13:3. 1 Cor. 10:1 - Paul's description of our fathers being under the cloud passing through the sea refers to Wisdom 19:7. 1 Cor. 10:20 - what pagans sacrifice they offer to demons and not to God refers to Baruch 4:7. 1 Cor. 15:29 - if no expectation of resurrection, it would be foolish to be baptized on their behalf follows 2 Macc. 12:43-45. Eph. 1:17 - Paul's prayer for a "spirit of wisdom" follows the prayer for the spirit of wisdom in Wisdom 7:7. Eph. 6:14 - Paul describing the breastplate of righteousness is the same as Wis. 5:18. See also Isaiah 59:17 and 1Thess. 5:8. Eph. 6:13-17 - in fact, the whole discussion of armor, helmet, breastplate, sword, shield follows Wis. 5:17-20. 1 Tim. 6:15 - Paul's description of God as Sovereign and King of kings is from 2 Macc. 12:15; 13:4. 2 Tim. 4:8 - Paul's description of a crown of righteousness is similar to Wisdom 5:16.
Heb. 4:12 - Paul's description of God's word as a sword is similar to Wisdom 18:15. Heb. 11:5 - Enoch being taken up is also referenced in Wis 4:10 and Sir 44:16. See also 2 Kings 2:1-13 & Sir 48:9 regarding Elijah. Heb 11:35 - Paul teaches about the martyrdom of the mother and her sons described in 2 Macc. 6:18, 7:1-42.
Heb. 12:12 - the description "drooping hands" and "weak knees" comes from Sirach 25:23. James 1:19 - let every man be quick to hear and slow to respond follows Sirach 5:11. James 2:23 - it was reckoned to him as righteousness follows 1 Macc. 2:52 - it was reckoned to him as righteousness.
James 3:13 - James' instruction to perform works in meekness follows Sirach 3:17. James 5:3 - describing silver which rusts and laying up treasure follows Sirach 29:10-11. James 5:6 - condemning and killing the "righteous man" follows Wisdom 2:10-20.
1 Peter 1:6-7 - Peter teaches about testing faith by purgatorial fire as described in Wisdom 3:5-6 and Sirach 2:5. 1 Peter 1:17 - God judging each one according to his deeds refers to Sirach 16:12 - God judges man according to his deeds. 2 Peter 2:7 - God's rescue of a righteous man (Lot) is also described in Wisdom
Rev. 1:18; Matt. 16:18 - power of life over death and gates of Hades follows Wis. 16:13. Rev. 2:12 - reference to the two-edged sword is similar to the description of God's Word in Wisdom 18:16. Rev. 5:7 - God is described as seated on His throne, and this is the same description used in Sirach 1:8. Rev. 8:3-4 - prayers of the saints presented to God by the hand of an angel follows Tobit 12:12,15. Rev. 8:7 - raining of hail and fire to the earth follows Wisdom 16:22 and Sirach 39:29. Rev. 9:3 - raining of locusts on the earth follows Wisdom 16:9. Rev. 11:19 - the vision of the ark of the covenant (Mary) in a cloud of glory was prophesied in 2 Macc. 2:7. Rev. 17:14 - description of God as King of kings follows 2 Macc. 13:4. Rev. 19:1 - the cry "Hallelujah" at the coming of the new Jerusalem follows Tobit 13:18. Rev. 19:11 - the description of the Lord on a white horse in the heavens follows 2 Macc. 3:25; 11:8. Rev. 19:16 - description of our Lord as King of kings is taken from 2 Macc. 13:4. Rev. 21:19 - the description of the new Jerusalem with precious stones is prophesied in Tobit 13:17.
The NT cites the LXX (the Greek OT) 60% of the time when it quotes the OT. Apparently the LXX, just as much as the MT (the Hebrew OT), was the OT for the NT writers. This likely means that they included the larger canon as well in their idea of what was scripture. Furthermore, Jews of the NT era (some of whom of course became Christians) had an idea of the Oral Torah, which was even more authoritative for them than the written (LXX and MT) versions of their scriptures.
Sometimes modern Christians seem to have forgotten that the history of the LXX and the MT was originally a debate among Christians defending the LXX and Jews (who reacted to the acceptance of the LXX of the Christians to reject it, even though it was a Jewish work) defending the MT.
Further, many people are ignorant of the more recent history of how the LXX books came to not be included in Protestant Bibles. It is not a question of having to change ones own ideas of what comprises the canon of scripture (what books are in the Bible), but learning to respect the different traditions.
Attachments
- Table_LXX.pptx494 KB


5 comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
Do you have some papers about how LXX interprets MT?
Thanks Theo; now I´m enrolled in a searching group about the interpretation indeed the theological interpretation the LXX to TM; I have read some articles about it but I have not found papers, articles or documents that specific take this subject. I understand that each passage (maybe) has different approaches, right now I{m interesting in general commentaries about how the Lxx interprets TM, after that I´m going to take an specific passage, possibly something that appears in the new testament.
Theo has answered well, I think. Probably the most famous instance of LXX interpreting the MT is where MT Isa 7:14 "young woman" (almah) becomes LXX "virgin" (parthenos) which is then picked up by the NT in reference to Jesus' birth (the situation is more complex than this, of course). I have a paper from many years ago about the NT use of the LXX in citing Isa 40 (and its precursors) "prepare the way." If I have not posted it yet, I will do so soon.
Hola Héctor, Gracias por tu respuesta, y por la de Roberto. Ahora entiendo mejor lo que quieres decir. Me gustaría saber más de tu grupo de investigación. ¿En qué universidad es? El libro de Isaías es obviamente un caso donde muchos estudiosos coinciden en que la interpretación actualizada juega un papel importante en el libro. Escriben como si estuvieran en una competición de descubrir una máxima cantidad de teología en el libro. En el Pentateuco el estrato teológico no es tan destacado, en los Salmos tampoco. En general, parece que los traductors alejandrinos tenían las mismas técnicas de interpretación (midrásica) como en el judaísmo de su tiempo, y en la exégesis griega de su tiempo (p.ej. de Omero). Pero no seguían un 'método.' Emanuel Tov escribió varios artículos sobre estos temas como, Midrash-Type Exegesis in the Septuagint of Joshua / Theologically Motivated Exegesis Embedded in the Septuagint etc., que puedes encontrar en su colección The Greek and Hebrew Bible. Collected Essays on the Septuagint. También en su libro The Text-Critical Use of the Septuagint puedes hallar cosas. Interpretación existe en varios niveles. Aejmelaeus (“Levels of Interpretation”, in On the Trail of the Septuagint Translators (Leuven 2007) menciona a. Interpretation on the level of Decoding. Tú mencionaste varias veces el TM, pero hazde cuenta que los traductores alejandrinos del Pentateuco no manejaban el TM en su tiempo (250 a.d.JC). El texto venía sin vocalización, y por consecuencia se veían forzadas para interpretar palabras en consonantes que eran ambigüas, p.ej. M-T-H como ‘cama’ o ‘bastón’ en Gen 47:31. Además había una tradición de lectura, según la cual ‘ver a Dios’ muchas veces fue traducido como ‘aparecer ante Dios.’ (Véase un articulo de Jan Joosten, “To See God.”) b. Interpretation on the level of Recoding. Es la manera de traducir lo entendido en la lengua meta. c. Interpretation as adaptation or reinterpretation. d. Interpretaion as en emergency solution (una categoría muy importante) e. Interpretation on the level of reception (o sea, por los (futuros) lectores. Este artículo y los demás escritos por ella (en el mismo volumen) son súmamente importantes para entender el asunto y a la vez seguir un método confiable. En los décadas pasadas muchos estudiosos del NT han vuelto su atención hacia la LXX. Muchos de ellos tienen el interés primeramente teológico. Lo que buscan en la LXX es teología. En cada deviación de la LXX con respecto al TM ellos ven una cosa teológica que les da “información” sobre la teología de los traductores. Sin embargo, no se dan cuenta de algo que los traductores sabemos, o sea, que los traductores son primeramente traductores. Eso implica: antes de concluir que las diferencias se deben a la teología del traductor, hay que establecer que no proviene las demandas de la lengua meta, como gramática, estilo, lógica, cultura etc. (Véase mi artículo “Linguistic or Ideological Shifts?”, en línea en https://sil.academia.edu/TheovanderLouw). Si no aplicamos estas restricciones, llegamos a pura fantasia, como puedes ver en “A Narratological Approach to the Septuagint”? en la misma página. Los estudiosos mencionados ahí pierden de la vista toda metología, y agarran la primera idea teológica que se les occurre a la mente para llegar a “resultados teológicos” espectaculares. Por eso, el reto principal al estudiar la pregunta cómo interpretaron los traductores de la LXX su texto fuente es metodológico. Espero que eso te sirva en algo. ¡Que tengas mucho éxito en tus estudios! Bendiciones, Theo.
Hola Theo, gracias por tan amplia respuesta; perdón por usar TM para referirme al texto hebreo. Estoy en una investigación en una universidad en Bogotá Colombia, llamada Uniminuto. El equipo quiere trabajar sobre el cambio teológico de lo que hizo el nuevo con el antiguo testamento, me han encargado que trabaje en cómo la LXX interpreta; por supuesto, el campo es muy amplio y en cada parte pueden darse diferentes acercamientos. Seguramente tendré que tomar ideas generales y luego intentar revisar un texto en hebreo y revisarlo en LXX para ver su acercamiento teológico, por el momento estoy recogiendo información y al no ser investigador de tiempo completo pues no tengo muchas horas en esto pero debo avanzar. Ya descargué levels of interpretation para revisarlo, además tengo Invitation to septuagint, algo de Cambridge history of the Bible y dos artículos de vetus testamentum (agios in the septuagint and its relation to the hebrew original, the hebraic character of septuagint greek) y uno de estudios bíblicos (apuntes para la exegesis y la teología de LXX Ex 3,14). Sin duda, la investigación está planteada en un campo amplio que debo limitar para producir algún escrito. Creo que sobre la interpretación de los traductores de la LXX no hay mucho, por lo menos no lo encuentro. Nuevamente gracias por tu respuesta y si sabes de algo más, te lo agradeceré. Uauuuuh acabo de ver tu trabajo doctoral, creo que eres el más indicado en el tema. En Cristo, Héctor